|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 97-100
Systematic review of successful rate of body weight loss after bariatric surgery
Odai Mohammed Albahli, Mohamad Alharbi, Yaser Albahli, Sayer Alotaibi
Department of Clinical Affairs, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Web Publication||6-Nov-2017|
Odai Mohammed Albahli
King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Bariatric surgery is an accepted treatment for obesity. And, only a limited number of studies were concerned with the outcome of significant weight loss following the surgery procedures.
Objective: the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate and demonstrate the comprehensive data about the significant loss of body weight of obese patients after appropriate techniques of different bariatric surgery procedures and to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss.
Methodology: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched from 1989 to July 15, 2016. Search terms included bariatric surgery, individual bariatric procedures, and obesity significant body weight loss. Studies were included if they described outcomes of interest, which were significant body weight loss after gastric bypass, gastric band, or sleeve gastrectomy performed on obese patients.
Conclusion: Significant body weight loss was achieved in most of the obese patients after undergoing bariatric surgery; most of the studies that were included in this review showed that all current bariatric operations lead to major weight loss.
Keywords: Bariatric, bypass, gastrectomy, surgery
|How to cite this article:|
Albahli OM, Alharbi M, Albahli Y, Alotaibi S. Systematic review of successful rate of body weight loss after bariatric surgery. Saudi Surg J 2017;5:97-100
|How to cite this URL:|
Albahli OM, Alharbi M, Albahli Y, Alotaibi S. Systematic review of successful rate of body weight loss after bariatric surgery. Saudi Surg J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2018 Mar 23];5:97-100. Available from: http://www.saudisurgj.org/text.asp?2017/5/3/97/217749
| Introduction|| |
Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in society recently; according to the World Health Organization, the prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing globally, and in 2010, there were 500 million people worldwide who met the criteria for obesity., Furthermore, it is connected with high rates of mortality because of the incidents of serious comorbidities, a significant number of which show complete determination after weight reduction. In addition, bariatric surgery results in extensive, maintained weight reduction in extremely obese populations. Although for the most part acknowledged as the best means for inciting weight loss in very heavy patients, as known Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are two major types of bariatric surgery procedures that cause significant weight loss in adults and are increasingly being performed in adolescents with morbid obesity following by gastric band. Few studies exist reporting outcomes longer than 2 years after the surgery was performed. Long-term outcome studies that exists are mostly case series, from limited geographical areas, or report surgical procedures no longer performed.,,,,
To recent event, viable long-term weight reduction through pharmacological treatment has been minor, leaving bariatric surgery as the main reported medicinal intercession giving significant, long-effective weight reduction for most patients who are seriously overweight. For those high-risk individuals, the quantities of studies reporting long-period weight reduction follow-up taking after bariatric surgery are limited and generally have incomplete follow-up.
Several studies ,,, have shown bariatric surgery as a successful long-term treatment for weight reduction for people with extreme (Class III) obesity, especially when measured 2 years postoperatively.
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate and demonstrate the comprehensive data about the significant loss of body weight of obese patients after appropriate techniques of different bariatric surgery procedures and to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss.
| Methodology|| |
A systematic review study was conducted and reported according to the review guidelines.
Data sources and searches
Comprehensive searches of the literature were performed on MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinical Trials from 1989 to July 15, 2016. The search was done by combination of (mesh) medical terms as following: “bariatric surgeries,” “gastric bypass,” “roux-en-y gastric bypass,” and “body weight loss, obesity, overweight.”
Search results were screened by scanning abstracts for the following exclusion criteria: publication of abstracts only, case reports, letters, comments, animal studies; languages other than English; duplicate studies; no surgical intervention; and lack of outcomes of interest (weight change). After removing excluded abstracts, full articles were obtained and studies were screened again more thoroughly using the same exclusion criteria.
| Results|| |
We identified 451 references and clinical studies between randomized clinical trial (RCT), Cohort studies, and systematic reviews. Part of these studies were excluded after reviewing titles, abstracts, and the complete journal articles and that because they did not discuss the outcomes of interest which is body weight loss. Twenty-six clinical studies ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, were included in the results and discussions of this review to evaluate the significant body weight loss; other studies were included in the background of this study to have evidence-based support for our study.
Twenty-four studies ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, reported outcome of interest which is weight loss outcomes. Most studies expressed mean weight loss (% EWL) (20/24 studies), followed by change in BMI (16/24) and change in absolute weight (11/24), of these 16 studies included sufficient information (mean %EWL or mean percentage of absolute weight loss and standard deviation) to calculate 95% confidence intervals. We demonstrated some of the study results [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Frequency distribution of percentage weight change from baseline to 2-year and 6-year follow-up examinations|
Click here to view
Out of these 24 studies, 11 studies were gastric bypass ,,,,,,,,,, (n = 3544 patients), 13 studies gastric band ,,,,,,,, (n = 4109 patients), and two SG (n = 115 patients)., Approximately half of the studies had follow-up time exceeding 3 years.
As the diagram demonstrating its shows that the percentages of participants in the gastric bypass surgery group are shown grouped by 5% of unadjusted baseline weight loss intervals at the 2-year and 6-year follow-up examinations.
Gastric bypass resulted in greater weight loss than the gastric band. All gastric bypass (11/11) and SG (2/2) cohorts had 95% confidence intervals of the reported mean or median exceeding 50% excess weight loss. This only occurred in 31% (4/13) of gastric band cohorts. The sample-size-weighted mean excess weight loss was 65.7% after gastric bypass (n = 3544 patients, 6/11 prospective cohorts) compared to 45.0% after gastric band (n = 4109 patients, 9/13 prospective cohorts). The sample-size-weighted mean excess weight loss after SG was 64.5% (n = 115 patients, 2/2 retrospective cohorts). The sample-size-weighted mean EWL between 2 years and 3 years or longer after surgery was significant within both gastric bypass (68.4% vs. 64.5%; P < 0.001) and gastric band (49.4% vs. 41.8%; P < 0.001). Gastric band studies reporting more than 50% excess weight loss by median, means, and 95% confidence intervals included two RCTs.,
Moreover, one study  was identified through our research which showed that after 3 years of following RYGB or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), they assessed percentage weight change from baseline and the percentage of patients with without pharmacologic therapy [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: (a) percent of weight change with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. (b) percent of weight. With Laproscopic Adjustable Gastric Band|
Click here to view
The 5 RYGB trajectories all show initial weight loss within the first 6 months after surgery [Figure 2]a. After 6 months, on average, the participants in Group 1 (2%) begin to regain weight while those in Groups 3, 4, and 5 continue to lose weight through 2 years. After 2-year follow-up, the trajectories for Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 begin to demonstrate some weight regain. However, in 76% of the RYGB participants represented (Groups 3–5), the weight regain is small compared to the overall loss.
[Figure 2]b shows 5 weight change trajectory groups for those who underwent LAGB. Almost two-thirds (62%) of the participants are included in Group 2 which shows the greatest average weight loss occurring in the first 6 months then a slowing of weight loss and stabilization after 2 years. LAGB participants in Group 1, the second most common trajectory (19%), experienced weight loss, on average, only during the first 6 months of follow-up, gaining weight, on average through year 3. The Group 5 trajectory (4%) shows continual weight loss throughout the 3-year period while Group 3 (14%) shows steady weight loss for the first 2 years and then slight weight regain from years 3 to 3. Group 4 includes only seven participants who experienced substantial weight loss through year two with an increase in weight afterward.
| Conclusion|| |
It was observed through this review that the bariatric surgery provides successful and sustained effects on weight loss and ameliorates obesity-attributable comorbidities in the majority of bariatric patients. Although risks of complication, reoperation, and death exist, still significant body weight loss was achieved in most of obese patients after undergoing bariatric surgery.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: A review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2253-71.
World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2010. Jama 2012;308:1122-31.
Deitel M. How much weight loss is sufficient to overcome major co-morbidities? Obes Surg 2001;11:659.
Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, Berk PD, Flum DR, Garcia L, et al.
Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA 2013;310:2416-25.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, et al.
Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;292:1724-37.
Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, Long SB, Morris PG, Brown BM, et al.
Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg 1995;222:339-50.
Favretti F, Segato G, Ashton D, Busetto L, De Luca M, Mazza M, et al.
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg 2007;17:168-75.
Sugerman HJ, Wolfe LG, Sica DA, Clore JN. Diabetes and hypertension in severe obesity and effects of gastric bypass-induced weight loss. Ann Surg 2003;237:751-6.
Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, Yunus T, Boone KB. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011;7:516-25.
Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium, Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, et al.
Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N
Engl J Med 2009;361:445-54.
Kushner RF, Noble CA. Long-term outcome of bariatric surgery: An interim analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81 10 Suppl:S46-51.
Kushner RF, Noble CA. Long-term outcome of bariatric surgery: An interim analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81 10 Suppl: S46-51.
Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, Maglione M, Sugerman HJ, Livingston EH, et al.
Meta-analysis: Surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:547-59.
Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, et al.
Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N
Engl J Med 2004;351:2683-93.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:W65-94.
Hall JC, Watts JM, O'Brien PE, Dunstan RE, Walsh JF, Slavotinek AH, et al.
Gastric surgery for morbid obesity. The Adelaide study. Ann Surg 1990;211:419-27.
Skroubis G, Anesidis S, Kehagias I, Mead N, Vagenas K, Kalfarentzos F. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus a variant of biliopancreatic diversion in a non-superobese population: Prospective comparison of the efficacy and the incidence of metabolic deficiencies. Obes Surg 2006;16:488-95.
Nguyen NT, Slone JA, Nguyen XM, Hartman JS, Hoyt DB. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: Outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 2009;250:631-41.
van Dielen FM, Soeters PB, de Brauw LM, Greve JW. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus open vertical banded gastroplasty: A prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg 2005;15:1292-8.
O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, Anderson M. A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: Comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg 2005;15:820-6.
Suter M, Giusti V, Worreth M, Héraief E, Calmes JM. Laparoscopic gastric banding: A prospective, randomized study comparing the Lapband and the SAGB: Early results. Ann Surg 2005;241:55-62.
Gravante G, Araco A, Araco F, Delogu D, De Lorenzo A, Cervelli V. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric bandings: A prospective randomized study of 400 operations performed with 2 different devices. Arch Surg 2007;142:958-61.
Mathus-Vliegen EM, de Wit LT. Health-related quality of life after gastric banding. Br J Surg 2007;94:457-65.
Kalfarentzos F, Skroubis G, Kehagias I, Mead N, Vagenas K. A prospective comparison of vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a non-superobese population. Obes Surg 2006;16:151-8.
Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, Kolotkin RL, LaMonte MJ, Pendleton RC, et al.
Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA 2012;308:1122-31.
Phillips E, Ponce J, Cunneen SA, Bhoyrul S, Gomez E, Ikramuddin S, et al.
Safety and effectiveness of realize adjustable gastric band: 3-year prospective study in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2009;5:588-97.
Basdevant A, Paita M, Rodde-Dunet MH, Marty M, Noguès F, Slim K, et al.
Anationwide survey on bariatric surgery in France: Two years prospective follow-up. Obes Surg 2007;17:39-44.
Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Stockman A, Vanommeslaeghe H, Snoeck E, Van Renterghem K, et al.
Long-term results of a prospective study on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2011;21:582-7.
Czupryniak L, Pawlowski M, Kumor A, Szymanski D, Loba J, Strzelczyk J. Predicting maximum Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-induced weight reduction – Preoperative plasma leptin or body weight? Obes Surg 2007;17:162-7.
Sekhar N, Torquati A, Youssef Y, Wright JK, Richards WO. A comparison of 399 open and 568 laparoscopic gastric bypasses performed during a 4-year period. Surg Endosc 2007;21:665-8.
Yan E, Ko E, Luong V, Wang HJ, Romanova M, Li Z. Long-term changes in weight loss and obesity-related comorbidities after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A primary care experience. Am J Surg 2008;195:94-8.
Hauser DL, Titchner RL, Wilson MA, Eid GM. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in US veterans. Obes Surg 2010;20:283-9.
Ponce J, Paynter S, Fromm R. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: 1,014 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:529-35.
Ray JB, Ray S. Safety, efficacy, and durability of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in a single surgeon U.S. community practice. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011;7:140-4.
Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, Jacobi C, Makarewicz W, Weigand G. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy – Influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg 2007;17:1297-305.
Kehagias I, Spyropoulos C, Karamanakos S, Kalfarentzos F. Efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy as sole procedure in patients with clinically severe obesity (BMI ≤50 kg/m(2)). Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013;9:363-9.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]